![]() ![]() nsloopup isn't working either, it times out.ġ0.0.0.0/24 dev em1 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0. For some reason though I have to assign a temporary IP via command line, shouldn't that file do that automatically?Īlso, while I can ping 8.8.8.8, I can't ping, even after adding it in the interfaces file. Another problem I had was my router's gateway was actually 10.0.0.1, I forgot because I'm used to 192.168.1.1. Thanks! After some changes I am able to ping my router and 8.8.8.8. Is there something I'm missing? I don't have much experience with networking. an ip-address that is not part of 10.0.0.0/24) and set a static route on your asa via the ip-address of the ethernet of the device with the loopback-address. Now I can't see the IP4 address in ifconfig and it says "Network is unreachable" when I ping the router. To see, if that is the reason for your issue, please configure the loopback-interface with an ip-address, that is not directly connected to the ethernet-interface of your asa (i.e. ![]() I took note of my computer that is connected to this network properly, so I changed /etc/networks/interfaces to auto em1 General tab of the Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) Properties dialog box or when it is used. So, if you reconfigure your routers IP to be 192.168.10.2/24, then you will be able to ping your router. For switch to be able to reach a remote network (in which router resides) it needs to have a gateway that resides in its own network - 192.168.10.0/24. If you cannot use Ping successfully at any point, verify the following configurations: Make sure that the local computers IP address is valid and that it is correct on the. Switch has a VLAN 1 SVI in network 192.168.10.0/24 and router is in 172.16.10.0/24 network. When I ping my router, I get "Destination Host Unreachable"Īnd when I ping, I get "Unknown host "Īnd when I ping a computer on this network, I get "Network is unreachable" out an unresponsive remote host, use Ping again to a different remote host. To start, I figured out that instead of "eth0" I have "em1", and I got it so I now see em1 in ifconfig. This discussion from the Cisco Learning Network has a nice explanation of why that is the case.Īnd it shows the optional parameter which can be used so that you can protect your network and still be able to ping your own interface.I just installed Ubuntu Server yesterday on my old laptop. The method I used was local pref on the internal (default) virtual router to designate primary and secondary ISP. Now you will need another static VRF route to leak the route 10.0.0. You can then configure eBGP on those links, along with redistribute. What you need is route leaking from VRF into Global Routing Table (you already did) and route leaking from Global Routing Table into VRF. When the simple version of that command is used one result is that you can no longer ping your own interface. Then create static routes (hub and spoke) to each ISP router (requires loopback). This command is used to improve security in the network and looks for "spoofed" packets. ![]() The issue was the effect of ip verify unicast. Your additional information made it clear that pinging the neighbor address did work and the problem was pinging your own address. The default IP address of the admin page is 192.168.0.254. It is plugged in and the LED status light indicates normal operation. The router (a TP-Link WR700N) is brand new, just taken out of the box. I had assumed that the issue was not being able to ping the neighbor address. I am attempting to reach the admin web page of a router connected directly to my laptop via Ethernet cable. (which did turn out to be the case) I had not correctly understood the issue. Especially show cdp neighbor would show whether the routers were able to communicate at layer 2 and could indicate that it was a layer 3 issue. I am able to ping the virtual machine from my laptop, but I cant reach anything (not even localhost) from the virtual machine - the output is always Bad address. In fact it was that type of possible issue that I was looking for when I asked for the information that you posted. I have a problem setting up networking to this machine (needed for the development). Depending on the platform (and perhaps version of code) it could cause the routers to not be able to communicate with each other. Using a straight through cable would not cause this kind of issue. This is a bit after the fact, and congratulations to Pauwen for suggesting removal of ip verify unicast, but let us try to clarify a few things about this issue. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |